Hi {{first_name}},
Short version: {{one_line_summary}}. If that's all you have time for, you're done.
The longer version. {{main_point_setup}} — which is the part most write-ups skip, because it's the part that takes work to check.
{{main_point_evidence}}. What that means in practice is {{main_point_implication}}, and it changes what you'd actually do on Monday morning: {{practical_takeaway}}.
Two other things worth your time this week:
→ {{link_1_title}} — {{link_1_reason}}
→ {{link_2_title}} — {{link_2_reason}}
That's it. Reply if you disagree — I read all of them, and the good arguments end up in a future issue.
Read the full write-upWhy it is shaped this way: The summary line at the top is the whole trick. It respects the reader who has thirty seconds, and it makes the email useful even when it is not read properly — which is most of the time. Ending with an invitation to reply is not a nicety: replies are among the strongest positive signals a mailbox provider can see from a recipient, and a newsletter that regularly gets them lands in the inbox for everyone else on the list.